STUDENTS’ LEARNING COMPARISON PRE AND DURING COVID-19

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Dr. Sonia Rafique,Dr. Ijaz Ahmad Tatlah,Rashda Majid

Abstract

This study compared the students’ achievement on the basis of face to face and online learning. The Positivist paradigm, Quantitative approach and survey method was used for the data collection. This was a causal comparative study as the researcher couldn’t manipulate the variables. Rather the researcher just explored the already available data. The Cluster sampling technique has been utilized by the researcher for the selection of the sample comprising 160 males and females students. The instrument for the data collection was the students’ achievement tests that have been used to determine the students’ terminal achievement level. These were their university’s terminal exam papers as well as their oral presentations and written assignments. The students’ scores in their oral presentations, written assignments and the final exams of one face-to-face and one online semester were taken. The collected data was analyzed while using the Descriptive Statistics including Mean, Standard Deviation and Paired sample t-test to examine the difference of students’ achievement on the basis of online and face-to-face learning. Based on the findings, it is revealed and concluded that the students’ achievement in face-to-face instructions/learning regarding “presentations”, “final exam score” and “over all achievement” was higher than their achievement in online instructions/ learning. However, there was no statistical difference was found regarding students’ achievement in “assignment”. On the basis of the results, it is recommended that the Higher Education Institutes should arrange the alternate days attendance but with face-to-face learning approach so that the students’ performance may not be affected.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

Altman, Mittal, & Pagalthivarthi. (2007). Knowledge based framework for facilitating e-learning services. International journal of innovation and learning, 112-126.
Arias, J. J., Swinton, J., & Anderson, K. (2018). Online Vs. Face-to-Face: A Comparison of Student Outcomes with Random Assignment. e-Journal of Business Education & Scholarship of Teaching, 1-23.
Christmann, E. P. (2017). A comparison of the achievement of statistics students enrolled in online and face-to-face settings. E-Learning and Digital Media, 323–330.
Mgutshini. (2013). Online or not? A comparison of students' experiences of an online and an on-campus class. Curationis. Curationis, 1-7.
Paul, J., & Jefferson, F. (2019). A Comparative Analysis of Student Performance in an Online vs. Face-to-Face Environmental Science Course From 2009 to 2016. Frontiers in Computer Science, 1-9.
Smart, & Cappel. (2001). Students’ perceptions of online learning: A comparative study. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 201-219.
Summers, J. J., Waigandt, A., & Whittaker, T. A. (2005). A Comparison of Student Achievement and Satisfaction in an Online Versus a Traditional Face-to-Face Statistics Class. Innovative Higher Education, 233-250.
Tatlah, I. A. (2015). Effect of leadership behaviour and School organizational health On students’achievement. Lahore: (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis) University of Management and Technology.
UE. (2021, November 17). https://ue.edu.pk/history.php. Retrieved from Introduction: Introduction
Watkins. (2005). Developing interactive e‐learning activities. Performance Improvement, 5-7.
Zulfiqar, M. S. (2016). The Teachers’ Perception about In-Service Training in Federal Government Educational Institutions Cantts/ Garrisons. Lahore: (Unpublished MPhil Thesis) University of Education.
Zulfiqar, M. S., Siddiqui, G. K., & Mahmood, S. (2020). A Comparison between Online and on-campus Classes: Taking University Students’ Perspective. Review of Education, Administration and Law, 157-163.