Strategies to Promote Lifelong Learning by Teachers: A Comparative Analysis of Public and Private Schools

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Syed Asad Abbas Rizvi, Nadira Dayo, Fatima Rauf, Aniqa Sangi, Maham Khoso D

Abstract

Learning is a never-ending process, yet, many teachers are unaware of its deliberate implementation and practical strategies. Therefore, the current research was conducted with the purpose of a) examining lifelong learning promoting strategies by teachers and b) comparing lifelong learning promoting strategies among public and private school teachers. For this purpose, a survey was taken, and data were collected from 78 teachers (45 public and 33 private school teachers) using a cluster sampling technique. The data was collected by using researcher developed lifelong learning promoting strategies survey. The survey contained 25 statements and five dimensions of lifelong learning i.e., support personalized learning, curricular alignment, encourage anytime learning attitude, promote students' autonomy, and provide helpful information with a Cronbach alpha of 0.976. An Independent sample t-test was performed, and the results showed no statistically significant difference in lifelong learning strategies survey scores of public and private school teachers with a 0.4% effect size. The study's results can promote learners' autonomy and utilize teaching strategies in both streams of the education sector that encourage learning beyond the classroom and strengthen the link between education and the job market.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

Argon, T., Yilmaz, D. C., & Ismetoglu, M. (2016). High school students' views on lifelong learning and career adaptabilities. The Anthropologist, 24(1), 354-362.
Bennetts, C. (2001). Lifelong learners: In their own words. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 20(4), 272-288.
Bryce, J., & Withers, G. (2003). Engaging secondary school students in lifelong learning.
Deveci, T. (2015). A comparative study of the lifelong learning propensities of English language learners: nationality, gender and length of study. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Gulf Perspectives, 12(1), 2-25.
Faure, E. (1972). Learning to be: The world of education today and tomorrow: Unesco.
Gottfried, A. E., Fleming, J. S., & Gottfried, A. W. (2001). Continuity of academic intrinsic motivation from childhood through late adolescence: A longitudinal study. Journal of educational psychology, 93(1), 3.
Hargreaves, D. H. (2004). Learning for life: The foundations for lifelong learning: Policy Press.
Kiley, M. M., & Cannon, R. A. (2000). Leap into... lifelong learning.
Kirby, J. R., Knapper, C., Lamon, P., & Egnatoff, W. J. (2010). Development of a scale to measure lifelong learning. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 29(3), 291-302.
Meerah, T. S. M., Lian, D. K. C., Osman, K., Zakaria, E., Iksan, Z. H., & Soh, T. M. T. (2011). Measuring life-long learning in the Malaysian Institute of Higher Learning context. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 18, 560-564.
Odabasi, F., Kuzu, A., & Gunuc, S. (2012). Characteristics of lifelong learner. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference.
Siddiqui, N., & Gorard, S. (2017). Comparing government and private schools in Pakistan: The way forward for universal education. International Journal of Educational Research, 82, 159-169.
Spiel, C., Lüftenegger, M., Wagner, P., Schober, B., & Finsterwald, M. (2011). Förderung von Lebenslangem Lernen–eine Aufgabe der Schule Stationen Empirischer Bildungsforschung (pp. 305-319): Springer.
Wain, K. (2000). The learning society: postmodern politics. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 19(1), 36-53.