A Psychological And Social Examination of Fyodor Dostoyevsky’s Crime and Punishment: A Theoretical Perspective
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
The study investigates the presence of repressed desires of a person in relation with society. It also explores the presence of inner actions of the person that creates a psychological tension throughout the novel, Crime and Punishment by Fyodor Dostoevsky. As Crime and Punishment is a classic writing by Fyodor Dostoevsky that focuses on social injustice and mental anguish, the study is designed to analyze the examination of social psychological perspective of the main character. These aspects are prominently linked with the protagonist, Rodion Raskolnikov; the person who committed murder and how he was “punished” for it. By applying Freud Psychoanalytic theory, the writer has used the qualitative approach to investigate thereason behind the criminality done by the Raskolnikov by killing a pawnbroker, AlyonaIvanovna and her sister just because he was troubled since the beginning of the story. As the interior monologue of the protagonistforces him to consider himself an extraordinary personcauses to do a grisly crime for which he has punished at the end of the novel. The findings of the current study reveal that the inner psyche of a person is more significant in order to explore relationship with societal circumstances. The employed themes for analysis are themes of alienation, morality and society and superman complex and psychology of crime. All these themes interlinked with the features of moral dilemmas of the protagonist. Having established a sample of data for analysis, the researcher reported conclusion that there are several social and psychological aspects that forces the protagonist to commit crime in order to achieve greatness. And this could help the future researchers to explore other characters of the novel as well with the help of these perspectives.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Dostoyevsky F (1972). Quoted in The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Vols. 1 and 2, London: Macmillan.
Eagleton T (1984). Literary Theory: An Introduction. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Frank J (1976). Dostoyevsky: The Seeds of Revolt. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Freud S (1973). New Introductory Lectures.Trans. James Strachey.Hamondsworth: Penguin Books.
Hartman H (1959). “Psychology as a Scientific Theory” in Psychoanalysis, Scientific Method and Philosophy (ed.) Sidney Hook. New York: New York University Press.
Lord R (1976). Dostoyevsky: Essays and Perspectives. Berkley: University of California Press.
Marx K (1984). A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy. Moscow. Progress Publishers.
Meyer GD (1987). Social Psychology. Holland: Hope College. Okonkwo CO (1980). NAISH: Criminal Law in Nigeria (2 nded.) London: Sweet and Maxwell.
Oloruntimehin O (1995).”Criminals are made not Born: Myth and Reality of Human Behaviour”, Inaugural Lecture Series, ObafemiAwolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
Rahv P (1978). Essays on Literature and Politics 1932-1972. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. Roland SE, Irving S,
Sarason BR (1986). Psychology: The Frontiers of Behavior. New York: Harper and Row Publishers. Smith ER, Mackie DM (1995). Social Psychology. New York: Worth Publishers.
Sutherland EH (1937).The Professional Thief. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wasioleck E (1964). Dostoyevsky: The Major Fiction. Massachusetts: M. I. T. Press.
Welleck R (1962). Dostoyevsky: A Collection of Critical Essays: Englewood Cliff: N. J. Prentice Hall.