Power Relations in Literature of Early Modern Period
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
This paper attempts to highlight the power relations being established through either by force or by consent of these colonized people residing in the New World. The focus of the study is how these people were represented in the literary works of Early Modern period. Shakespeare’s plays written in this period are reckoned representative of this age of discovery and exploration. His plays project the political, historical and religious conflicts of the time. This power struggle between European explorers and the Natives emerging in new found lands is also depicted in his plays. “The Tempest” which is now perceived as colonial text; was written in 1611 marks the beginning British attempts to settlements in America under the rule of James I. The power struggle between the settlers and the Natives in America and the Island of Prospero will be compared and discussed in this paper. The historical background of early exploration expeditions, the political and religious motivational drive that led to these journeys will be taken into account in order to understand the concept exploration in relation to Early Modern period. The power imbalance in religious domination that was prevalent in Europe between the Catholics and the Protestants is also regarded as one of the most consequential factors in formation of colonies and settlements in other parts of the world. Hadfield says that while “attempting to reconstruct the history of 16th century political debate that one cannot easily separate contemporary political works from fictional material” (Hadfield 1). These historical, political and religious factors will be taken into account before the analysis of power play presented in “The Tempest”. Moreover, the study will help the students of English literature to understand the new aspects of early modern period.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Ashcroft, Bill., Griffths, Gareth., Tiffin, Helen. “Post Colonial Studies”, “The Key Concepts” 2007
Begum, Tuglu. “Identities in The Tempest, Tempests in Identities”, International Journal of English and Literature”, 2015.
Bhabha HK (2000). “Interrogating Identity: The Post Colonial Prerogative.” Identity: A Reader.
Boehmer, Elleke. “Colonial and post colonial literature. Oxford and New York”. 1995.
Child, P and William, “An introduction to post colonial theory”, 1997.
Gandhi, L , “Post colonial theory: Critical introduction”, Dehli,1999.
Longwood, http://www.longwood.edu/staff/mcgeecw/notesoninterpellation.htm. Accessed March 2017
Greenblatt Stephan. “Culture.” Critical Terms for Literary Study. Eds. Frank Lentricchia and Thomas McLaughlin. 1990.
Jeffrey, Knapp. “An Empire Nowhere; England America and Literature from Utopia to The Tempest” 1992
Loomba, A. “Gender Race Renaissance Drama” 1992
Paul Brown, “Thing of Darkness, I acknowledge mine”, 2006.
Said, Edward. “Orientalism” 1978.
Spencer, Theodore. “Twentieth Century Interpretations of The Tempest”, USA: Engle Wood Cliff, 1969.
Thomas, Scanlan. “Colonial Writing and the New World 1583-1671” 1999.
Virginia, Vaughan and Alden, Vaughan. “The Tempest”, “Arden Third Edition” 2011.