A Comparative Discourse Analysis of Cross Cultural Motivational Speakers: Using NLP

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Muhammad Abdullah Khan, Ali Hussain Bin Sadiq

Abstract

Motivational discourse serves as a symbolic process where speakers aim to persuade individuals to reconsider their attitudes or beliefs about life. This study explores the uncharted territory of motivational speeches as a persuasive genre. It aims to understand how audiences emotionally and cognitively respond to motivational speakers at an abstract level. Employing Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) as a methodological framework, the study investigates Mind Control Language patterns, which guide effective communication in daily life and public speaking. The research focuses on examining motivational speeches from three continents, emphasizing NLP strategies. Using a mixed-method approach, the study employs quantitative analysis for NLP pattern results and qualitative methods for analyzing motivational discourse. The identification of NLP patterns utilizes the Corpus tool Lancs Box. The patterns include Cause and Effect, Universal Quantifiers, Modal Operators, Mind Reading, Lost Performatives, Presupposition, and Comparative Structure. Findings suggest that American motivational speakers use NLP patterns more frequently than speakers from other continents, while European motivational speakers use them less frequently. Acknowledging the study's data limitations, it provides a methodological foundation for future research. Future studies could expand the dataset, comparing speeches and speakers to delve deeper into the impact of NLP techniques on audience perception.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

Abouelenine, S. (2021). Persuasion in President Biden‟s Inauguration Speech. Revue de Traduction et Langues Volume20 Numéro01, 186-208.
Alamdar, F. S., & Karbalaei, A. (2015). The Relationship between Neuro-Linguistic Programming and Anxiety and Self-Esteem among Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners. International Journal of Educational Investigations, 2(8), 108-130.
Anjomshoa, M. R., Esmailzadeh, M., & Keshtidar, M. (2020). Effects of neuro-linguistic programming course on job stress, positive organizational behavior and job motivation in physical education teachers. Pedagogy of physical culture and sports, 24(3), 111-117.
Anjomshoaa, H., Snagui Moharer, R., & Shirazi, M. (2020). Comparing the effectiveness of training cognitive behavioral therapy and neuro-linguistic programming strategies on enhancing resilience of high school students in Kerman, Iran. International Journal of Pediatrics, 8(8), 11877-11889.
Arshad, A., Azher, M., Nawaz, S., & Hassan, S. (2022). Anatomizing Words beyond Gender: A Composite Study on Pakistani Motivational Speeches.
Bashir, A., & Ghani, M. (2012). Effective communication and neurolinguistic programming. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences (PJCSS), 6(1), 216-222.
Bovbjerg, K. M. (2007). Personal Development under Market Conditions: NLP and the emergence of an ethics of sensitivity based on the notion of untapped personal potentials. Salamon & Ramstedts.
Bowman, C., Ronch, J., & Madjaroff, G. (2010). The power of language to create culture. Retrieved, on, 30(4), 2018.
Cargile, A. C., & Giles, H. (1997). Understanding language attitudes: Exploring listener affect and identity. Language & Communication, 17(3), 195-217.
Dixon, P. N., Parr, G. D., Yarbrough, D., & Rathael, M. (1986). Neurolinguistic programming as a persuasive communication technique. The Journal of social psychology, 126(4), 545-550.
Dondon, P., & Legall, J. (2006). Neuro-Linguistic programming: a personal development tool applied to the pedagogy and to the improvement of teachers/students relations. WSEAS EDU, 6, 16-18.
Einspruch, E. L., & Forman, B. D. (1985). Observations concerning research literature on neurolinguistic programming. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 32(4), 589.
Farahani, F. (2018). The effect of neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) on reading comprehension in English for specific purposes courses. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 6(1), 79-85.
Gee, J. P., Michaels, S., & O'Connor, M. C. (1992). Discourse analysis. The handbook of qualitative research in education. J. Preissle. Sydney, Academic Press Inc, 227-291.
Motivational Speaker on Dental Student‟s Performance on National Board Part 1 (NBDE-1). J Health Edu Res Dev, 3(146), 2.
Haider, G. (2014). Analysis of Malala Yousaf Zai‟s speech: application of Aristotle‟s ethos, pathos, and logos. International Journal of English and Education. ISSN, 2278-4012.
Hussain, R., Alam, Y., & Zahid, M. S. (2022). „Awaken the Giant Within‟: Linguistic Explorations into the Art of Delivering Motivational Talks. Jahan-e-Tahqeeq, 5(1), 60-70.
Keblawi, F. (2006). Motivational Orientations, Attitudes, and Demotivation: A review of language learning motivation theories. Aberdeen University Press, 12, 26-27.
Khalifa, R. (2019). Verbal Repetition in Neuro-Linguistic Programming with Special Reference to the Political Speeches of Egyptian and American Leaders. Bulletin of the Faculty of Arts, 79(4), 86.
Lawrence, S. G. (2015). Waking up audiences: lessons in rhetorical devices. Communication Teacher, 29(4), 212-218.
Martin, C. (2001). The life coaching handbook: Everything you need to be an effective life coach: Crown House Publishing.
Mshvenieradze, T. (2013). Logos Ethos and Pathos in Political Discourse. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 3(11).
Pinsker, S. (2001). Was Ralph Waldo Emerson our first motivational speaker? The Virginia Quarterly Review, 77(3), 509-513.
Sharif, S., & Aziz, E. A. (2015). Application of Neuro-Linguistic programming techniques to enhance the motivation of At-Risk student. IJAEDU-International E-Journal of Advances in Education, 1(1), 42-48.
Tosey, P., & Mathison, J. (2009). Neuro-linguistic programming: A critical appreciation for managers and developers: Springer.
Zeb, F., & Hameed, A. (2020). Neurolinguistic Programming and English Language Teaching: An Exploration of Linguistic Variants in NLP for its Connection to ELT. sjesr, 3(4), 96-105.