Pros and Cons of 18th Amendment: A study of Center-Province relations 2010-2022

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Dr Shahzad Munawar
Dr. AHTASHAM JAN BUTT
Dr. ARFAN LATIF

Abstract

The 18th Constitutional Amendment, enacted in Pakistan in 2010, marked a significant shift in the country's governance structure by devolving powers to the provinces. This article critically examines the pros and cons of this transformative amendment, focusing specifically on its impact on the center-province relationship. On the positive side, the amendment sought to enhance provincial autonomy, granting provinces greater control over their resources and decision-making processes. This led to increased fiscal decentralization and empowered local governments. However, challenges emerged in the implementation phase, revealing potential drawbacks. The amendment's critics argue that it has strained the financial capacity of provinces, leading to disparities and raising concerns about national unity. Additionally, questions have been raised about the impact on federal institutions, as the devolution of powers may have weakened their ability to address national issues effectively. This article provides a comprehensive analysis of the 18th Constitutional Amendment's implications for the center-province relationship, shedding light on the nuanced dynamics that have unfolded since its enactment.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

Adeney, K. (2007). “Federalism and Ethnic Conflict Regulation in India and Pakistan,” Palgrave, 116.
Ashraf, M. I. (2016). “Federalism and Provincial autonomy: Political and Economic Dimensions under the Constitution of Pakistan 1973,” ((Unpublished) Ph.D. Thesis submitted to: Politics and IR, IIU Islamabad, Pakistan.
Diaz-Cayeros, A. (2004). ‘The centralization of fiscal authority: An empirical investigation of Popitz’s law’, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American political Science Association.
Hamid, S. (2010). Impact of the 18th amendment on federation-provinces relations. Islamabad, Pakistan: Pakistan Institute of Legislative Development (PILDAT).
Hussain, M. G. (1993). Constitutional History of Pakistan. Kausar Brothers, Lahore.
Institute of Public Policy. (2011). State of the economy: Devolution in Pakistan – Fourth annual report, 2011. Lahore, Pakistan: Cross Media
Ivanyna, M., & Shah, A. (2011b). Decentralization and corruption: New cross-country evidence. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 29(2), 344–362.
Ivanyna, M., & Shah, A. (2012). How close is your government to its people? Worldwide indicators on localization and decentralization (Policy Research Working Paper 6138). Washington, DC: World Bank.
Jamy, H. N., Paul, J., Bajwa, E., Sumbal, A., Zaman, S., Siddique, N. S., …, & Shah, Q. M. (2012). Strategic appraisal of 18th amendment: Federal/provincial roles and impact on service delivery. Lahore, Pakistan: National School of Public Policy.
Kalid, I. (2013). “Politics of Federalism in Pakistan: Problems and Prospects,” Journal of South Asian Studies A Research Journal of South Asian Studies Vol. 28, No. 1, January – June 2013.
Khan, H. (2001). Constitutional and Political History of Pakistan. Oxford University Press, Karachi.
Levinson, S. V. (1995). Responding to imperfection: The theory and practice of constitutional amendment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Mahmood, M. (2018). “The Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan 1973 (with Commentary),” Al- Qaunoon Publishers Lahore.
Niaz, I. (2010). The culture of power and governance of Pakistan 1947–2008. Karachi, Pakistan: Oxford University Press
Rana, M. A. (2020). Decentralization Experience in Pakistan: The 18th Constitutional Amendment. Asian Journal of Management Cases 17(1) 61–84, 2020
Rehman, Y. (2010). The Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 as Amended by Constitution (18th Amendment) Act, 2010. Punjab Law Book House, Lahore.

Most read articles by the same author(s)